Quick Summary
Cursor
An AI-powered IDE built on Visual Studio Code, offering advanced autocomplete, natural language commands, and collaborative coding tools.
Rating:
4.5/5
Gorilla
An AI assistant enabling large language models (LLMs) to accurately invoke APIs through semantic and syntactic natural language queries.
Rating:
3.7/5
Tool Overview
1st
Cursor
Agentic AI Assistant
2nd
Gorilla
AI Assistant
Features
Features
| Feature | Cursor | Gorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Subtype | IDE | Web App |
| Recommendation | Recommended | Ignore |
| AI Model Compatibility | Compatible with OpenAI GPT models | — |
| Intelligent Code Assistance | Context-aware suggestions and multi-line code completion | — |
| Natural Language Commands | Translate plain English into executable code | — |
| Multi-File Editing | Efficient simultaneous refactoring across multiple files | — |
| Real-Time Collaboration | Shared rules and collaborative AI workflows | — |
| Terminal Integration | Natural language conversion to terminal commands | — |
| API Invocation | — | Enables LLMs to invoke over 1,600 APIs accurately |
| Semantic Matching | — | Ensures API calls are semantically and syntactically correct |
| Reduced Hallucination | — | Minimizes LLM-generated errors in API usage |
| APIBench Integration | — | Leverages the APIBench dataset for extensive API training |
| Scalable API Store | — | Supports an ever-growing collection of APIs |
Pricing
Pricing Plans
| Plan | Cursor | Gorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 Basic features with API key requirement for advanced capabilities | $0 Basic API invocation capabilities |
| Pro | $19/month Enhanced AI workflows and advanced integrations | $18/month Enhanced API matching and lower latency |
| Enterprise | Custom Scalable team-focused features and dedicated support | Custom Scalable deployment with enterprise-level API integration |
Pros & Cons
Cursor
Pros
- •Advanced AI autocomplete with contextual awareness
- •Powerful multi-file editing capabilities
- •Seamless integration with Git and VS Code extensions
- •Natural language terminal commands for simplified workflows
Cons
- •Steep learning curve for advanced features
- •Requires API key for full functionality
- •Limited offline usability
Gorilla
Pros
- •Accurate API invocation through LLMs
- •Minimized API call hallucinations
- •Extensive APIBench dataset integration
Cons
- •Requires precise natural language input for accuracy
- •Limited flexibility for uncommon APIs
- •Early-stage product with ongoing refinements
Our Recommendation
Based on the comparison above, we recommend Cursor for most users because:
- Best overall feature set
- Competitive pricing
- Strong user ratings