Quick Summary
GitHub Copilot Workspace
A Copilot-native development environment facilitating task-oriented workflows, real-time collaboration, and efficient iterative development.
Rating:
4.3/5
Cursor
An AI-powered IDE built on Visual Studio Code, offering advanced autocomplete, natural language commands, and collaborative coding tools.
Rating:
4.5/5
Tool Overview
2nd
![GitHub Copilot Workspace](/static/logo/github_copilot_workspace.png)
GitHub Copilot Workspace
AI Agent
1st
![Cursor](/static/logo/cursor.png)
Cursor
Agentic AI Assistant
Features
Features
Feature | Cursor | GitHub Copilot Workspace |
---|---|---|
Subtype | IDE | Workspace |
Recommendation | Recommended | Upcoming |
AI Model Compatibility | Compatible with OpenAI GPT models | — |
Intelligent Code Assistance | Context-aware suggestions and multi-line code completion | — |
Natural Language Commands | Translate plain English into executable code | — |
Multi-File Editing | Efficient simultaneous refactoring across multiple files | — |
Real-Time Collaboration | Shared rules and collaborative AI workflows | — |
Terminal Integration | Natural language conversion to terminal commands | — |
Task-Oriented Development | — | Coordinate complex multi-file changes with structured plans |
Iterative Editing | — | Editable specifications and regeneration without starting over |
Collaborative Environment | — | Real-time sharing and version tracking |
IDE Integration | — | Seamless integration with tools like Visual Studio Code |
Pricing
Pricing Plans
Plan | Cursor | GitHub Copilot Workspace |
---|---|---|
Free | $0 Basic features with API key requirement for advanced capabilities | $0 Access to basic task workflows |
Pro | $19/month Enhanced AI workflows and advanced integrations | $25/month Advanced collaboration and code review features |
Enterprise | Custom Scalable team-focused features and dedicated support | Custom Scalable solutions for large teams |
Pros & Cons
GitHub Copilot Workspace
Pros
- •Task-oriented development across multiple files
- •Real-time collaborative editing
- •Integrated debugging and testing workflows
Cons
- •Still in development with limited public availability
- •Resource-intensive for larger projects
- •Learning curve for fully utilizing iterative workflows
Cursor
Pros
- •Advanced AI autocomplete with contextual awareness
- •Powerful multi-file editing capabilities
- •Seamless integration with Git and VS Code extensions
- •Natural language terminal commands for simplified workflows
Cons
- •Steep learning curve for advanced features
- •Requires API key for full functionality
- •Limited offline usability
Our Recommendation
Based on the comparison above, we recommend Cursor for most users because:
- Best overall feature set
- Competitive pricing
- Strong user ratings